Comments on: Your Mac in Science: Demystification http://isource.com/2008/01/30/your-mac-in-science-demystification/ #1 Source for iPad, iPhone, iPod, Mac and AppleTV Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:06:45 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.6 By: madmacmat http://isource.com/2008/01/30/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29255 Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:09:52 +0000 http://www.mactropolis.com/macs-in-science/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29255 humm, very nice, folks, thanks for the valuable comments! in detail:

@Wayne: Yessir, second language, sir! In spite of the ugly blot on my shirt You uncovered I will strive for perfection, english being not only my daily bread as a scientist but my passion language- wise…
@jgo: I am not sure I got You right- in terms of making the primary readout I think it’s the least amount of hassle to take what’s connected and running the software predestined to do the job- in contrast to the processing part where for almost any data there’s an open source solution for Your Mac. There are exceptions to this, MicroManager being one: this opensource software connects to Your fluorescence microscope and is actually designed to take over the control- it proves very fruitful to very naively search the the net for a solution, just as Burly pointed out…
finally, I couldn’t find better words than christoph rounding up things… thank You for being in the City, all of You!

]]>
By: Christoph http://isource.com/2008/01/30/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29254 Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:27:33 +0000 http://www.mactropolis.com/macs-in-science/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29254 Good points, Burly!
I would add that the speed and ease to obtain your results matters most. The Mac in its current incarnation happens to encapsulate in one platform good performance, a solid Unix base and resulting access to hardcore scientific applications, ease of use at the desktop level, good integration into the world of desktop PCs, and above all a clean system design. This results in a nice work flow and makes it therefore a very productive scientific workstation.

That’s quite unlike the mess which characterizes current Linux PCs at the desktop level. And even more unlike the inscrutable black box which is the OS internals and many applications of Windows PCs. And before someone flames me: I use and support both of these latter platforms, but hate them with a passion for their shortcomings. The Mac simply lets me get my work done.

Not that I am a Mac zealot. If there’s ever a better platform and Macs start to lag behind, I will move on. Just like I’ve done previously with VAX VMS, SUNs and SGIs. But right now (computing) life is good.

]]>
By: Burly http://isource.com/2008/01/30/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29253 Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:07:02 +0000 http://www.mactropolis.com/macs-in-science/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29253 Hi,

I’d direct people to http://macresearch.org/ if you really want to get started. There are a mass of options. Also all the Linux based stuff pretty much runs on OS X and X windows so that adds to the arsenal. Python (scipy) is fairly amazing. There are a lot of tools out there. Some labs here are almost entirely mac based, some are entirely windows based and some are entirely linux based. Others mix and match. Often it’s historical presendent that sets a labs computer base and until a dedicated student comes along and assembles something new the presendent sticks. There is nothing wrong with using any of these platforms to do your work. After all it’s not what platform your on but your results which matter.

]]>
By: Dr Richard http://isource.com/2008/01/30/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29252 Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:23:54 +0000 http://www.mactropolis.com/macs-in-science/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29252 Well, you could try National Instruments Labview Hardware (USB, GPIB, Serial, Firewire or even LAN), or you could use a bluetooth controller (assuming the instrument end has a serial connection).

Yeah, you may need to write some code, or get a tame programmer to do this for you – but its not impossible – and more companies are releasing drivers all the time.

Ocean Optics (for example) do a fantastic USB spectrometer, with OSX software as a starter for 10.

]]>
By: Wayne McDermott http://isource.com/2008/01/30/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29251 Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:18:04 +0000 http://www.mactropolis.com/macs-in-science/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29251 “Time coming in this section here at Mactropolis”

Can I assume English is a second language for you?

]]>
By: jgo http://isource.com/2008/01/30/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29250 Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:46:25 +0000 http://www.mactropolis.com/macs-in-science/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29250 So, how DO I safely hook my Mac up to lab equipment like radioactivity counters, spectrographic analyzers, micro-scales, oxygen uptake sensors, radio receivers, gene sequencers, etc.?

]]>
By: Jeff Younker http://isource.com/2008/01/30/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29249 Tue, 05 Feb 2008 06:41:24 +0000 http://www.mactropolis.com/macs-in-science/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29249 While apples are expensive they are not overpriced. In a feature by feature comparison they’re within a few dollars of comparable dells.

]]>
By: Partners in Grime http://isource.com/2008/01/30/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29248 Fri, 01 Feb 2008 02:49:33 +0000 http://www.mactropolis.com/macs-in-science/your-mac-in-science-demystification/#comment-29248 Good comments, but what a person really needs in order to change is to have an open mind. I don’t see that happening much.

]]>