Comments on: Searching For a New Quicksilver: LaunchBar http://isource.com/2008/06/05/searching-for-a-new-quicksilver-launchbar/ #1 Source for iPad, iPhone, iPod, Mac and AppleTV Mon, 09 Jun 2008 01:26:44 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.6 By: TwisterMc http://isource.com/2008/06/05/searching-for-a-new-quicksilver-launchbar/#comment-29653 Mon, 09 Jun 2008 01:26:44 +0000 http://www.mactropolis.com/?p=618#comment-29653 LaunchBar sounds nice, but it comes at a price. That’s why I haven’t tried it. However, you left out Google Desktop Search.

]]>
By: mat!-) http://isource.com/2008/06/05/searching-for-a-new-quicksilver-launchbar/#comment-29652 Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:59:36 +0000 http://www.mactropolis.com/?p=618#comment-29652 thanks for the comment! I can see your point of doing the searching in a point-and- click search routine 😉 …
anyway, I am convinced that this is just way beyond any visual file organizer, because the only file structure You actually need is Your memory-

up until now it was the case that in need of having organized documents we adapted to the file structure a computer was capable of: Folder/subfolder/file… if You didn’t remember that file is hidden there, in older days You were bummed and nowadays You’d spotlight it…

My point here is that these launchers surpass the file directory step in finding the file Your were thinking of regardless of were it physically is hidden in the directory.

Obviously in the end, I agree, will everyone have to choose the method most convenient (in my terms that is speed), but I like the idea to actually HAVE a choice there 😉 cheers!

]]>
By: Stolencheese http://isource.com/2008/06/05/searching-for-a-new-quicksilver-launchbar/#comment-29651 Thu, 05 Jun 2008 21:39:42 +0000 http://www.mactropolis.com/?p=618#comment-29651 Sounds alright but I’m happy with Finder! 🙂

]]>