Comments on: Shocker: New App Store ‘Sexy Apps’ Policy Causing Ridiculous Rejections, Reversals, and Plenty of Criticism http://isource.com/2010/02/23/shocker-new-app-store-sexy-apps-policy-causing-ridiculous-rejections-reversals-and-plenty-of-criticism/ #1 Source for iPad, iPhone, iPod, Mac and AppleTV Thu, 14 Oct 2010 20:57:09 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.6 By: sexy app http://isource.com/2010/02/23/shocker-new-app-store-sexy-apps-policy-causing-ridiculous-rejections-reversals-and-plenty-of-criticism/#comment-22917 Sun, 02 May 2010 15:30:00 +0000 http://isource.com/iphone-app-store/shocker-new-app-store-sexy-apps-policy-causing-ridiculous-rejections-reversals-and-plenty-of-criticism/%20#comment-22917 stop the proibition

]]>
By: Just When You Thought App Store Decisions Couldn’t Get Any Stupider … « Just Another iPhone Blog http://isource.com/2010/02/23/shocker-new-app-store-sexy-apps-policy-causing-ridiculous-rejections-reversals-and-plenty-of-criticism/#comment-20514 Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:34:27 +0000 http://isource.com/iphone-app-store/shocker-new-app-store-sexy-apps-policy-causing-ridiculous-rejections-reversals-and-plenty-of-criticism/%20#comment-20514 […] still seeing all the repercussions from Apple’s recent ban on ‘overtly sexual’ apps, and they’re typically inconsistent application of the new policy.  Now they appear to […]

]]>
By: John Steele http://isource.com/2010/02/23/shocker-new-app-store-sexy-apps-policy-causing-ridiculous-rejections-reversals-and-plenty-of-criticism/#comment-20249 Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:55:44 +0000 http://isource.com/iphone-app-store/shocker-new-app-store-sexy-apps-policy-causing-ridiculous-rejections-reversals-and-plenty-of-criticism/%20#comment-20249 I am not a prude, I am not anti-porn, and I am aware that Safari and iPod video player and camera roll are probably the biggest sources of objectionable material on the iPhone. All that being said, I am happy this smut is getting pulled (although if I had my way all the fart apps would have been pulled first). The iPhone is quietly elegant. The "sexy apps" totally have cheapened the experience for me. Now on the other side, Apple needs to be consistent. In addition, I feel for developers who had the rules changed on them after the fact. Imagine if you spent time and other resources to create a financial app, and then Apple denied all money apps 6 months later? It is arguably more foreseeable with "sexy apps", but still they played by the rules. In conclusion, I am selfishly very happy with this decision and feel it was long overdue.

]]>