Comments on: Twitterrific iPhone App 2.1 Update Now Available

By: Twitterrific 2.1 hits the AppStore

Twitterrific 2.1 hits the AppStore — Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:33:06 +0000

[…] JustAnotherIphoneBlog] Share […]

By: Bloggliv.se

Bloggliv.se — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:34:44 +0000

Something that stops me from using Twitterrific is the huge amount of data it uses. One single tweet took a total of 28 KB to read and in TwitterFon 18 tweets took 34 KB! I'm not sure but it looks like Twitterrific doesn't cache thumpnails and perhaps there is the reason.

By: patrickj

patrickj — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:50:01 +0000

In reply to jojo10040. Pretty sure the only difference is ads or no ads, no ads in Premium version - but double-check that at their site or wherever.

By: jojo10040

jojo10040 — Thu, 20 Aug 2009 04:09:51 +0000

whats the diff between the free version and the premium. when i go into the app store, the description of the apps features are the same. has anyone noticed that? so whats really the diff between the two versions?

By: patrickj

patrickj — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:52:38 +0000

In reply to Turbohat. Wow, good points - never realized either of those were missing. Thanks for sharing.

By: Turbohat

Turbohat — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:41:41 +0000

A great update (I used Twitteriffic before switching to Twitterfon) but still a few things missing before I will switch back.

1. Integrate ReadItlater as well as Instapaper (Instapaper doesn't work on IE and I have to use this at work)
2. Enable posting of comment to twitpic images (as Twitterfon does)

The UI of Twitteriffic is great. Very attractive. If these two feature were implimented I'd switch back permanently.