Comments on: Intel’s New Ivy Bridge CPU Architecture Could Pave the Way for Smaller MacBook Pros https://isource.com/2011/09/16/intels-new-ivy-bridge-cpu-architecture-could-pave-the-way-for-smaller-macbook-pros/ #1 Source for iPad, iPhone, iPod, Mac and AppleTV Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:41:24 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.6 By: Phil Parker https://isource.com/2011/09/16/intels-new-ivy-bridge-cpu-architecture-could-pave-the-way-for-smaller-macbook-pros/#comment-39432 Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:41:24 +0000 http://isource.com/?p=43592#comment-39432 Thin, low powered and light weight are simply over rated. Motorola and Casio have proven overwhelming successes with their tough, waterproof phones. Just as phones were about to reach credit card thin dimensions, these companies came out with bulkier but rugged lines initially targeting the construction, police and military markets. As anticipated, these markets welcomed these phones, but the big surprise was just how many people were sick and tired of being forced to replace phones that were in no way abused, but just not treated like a fine crystal or a sugar cube that would melt at the slightest presence of moisture.

With this said, It’s too bad apple doesn’t dedicate an entire line to perform to such standards. Imagine a MBP that is 1.2″ thick that is no worse for wear after being hosed off if dropped in mud and is powered by dual batteries that last 20 hours – not to mention the additional room created within the case at this dimension allows for a quad core processor – who cares if it weighs 8 pounds?

Despite owning the latest and greatest of the Macbook Pros, both 13 and 17 inch versions (along with 14 others since 2003) my favorite portable remains the last edition 12 inch Powerbook from 2005. It’s actually more of a “thightop” able to perform basic web surfing, downloads, music and video editing as well as preparation of documents and presentations every bit as fast and capable as the best Macbook Pro.

The 17″ is a true laptop and is very comfortable to use as such. The 15″ is neither. However, as a laptop it forces you to sit with your legs uncomfortably too close together while offering a negligible weight savings over 17. And while the 17 is a great laptop, it’s a bit smallish as a true studio model. Apple should consider 13, 17 and 20 inch portables as well as adding the 11″ to the Pro lineup.

Ultra thin and lightweight are great qualities, but to prioritize this over function and durability without offering the option for ruggedness seems a bit naive. The reality of owning a portable is not if, but when encountering less than ideal situations, vs. to be expected to avoid such perils. Considering the level of warranty and free services Apple offers at their stores, a secondary line featuring such things would benefit all concerned.

At least this is how it will be when I take over the world, so why wait for this to happen? And by the way, come on Steve, consider a little part time before complete retirement. You will be missed!

]]>